Queens Congresswoman Grace Meng ( representing the 6th Congressional district of Queens NY) in office since January of 2009 has recently reached out to her constituents and asks what is most important to them that she can fight for when she goes back to work in Congress this fall 2025. Is this a Rhetorical question? She should know since she has been in Congress a long time. Or was this a publicity stunt to show she cares?
Congresswoman Meng, do what Democrats don’t want you to do work with President Trump on behalf of the working New York City middle and lower class; How about working on crime, kill the no bail laws, get funding for more police; move back to affordable energy instead of windmills, solar energy that are far more expensive (subsidized), less efficient and is fueling inflation (6,000 + products use oil in their development). Windmills and solar energy raised my utility and gas bills; we can reverse the inflationary trend by going back to oil gas and Nuclear energy. The United States as an industrial society competing in the world markets must have cheap energy to compete and survive as world leaders economically and militarily.
Help President Trump get rid of the illegal migrants that aggravated an all ready existing housing crises, put pressure on our infrastructure, medical systems, drug supplies, schools etc. When you are forced to put illegal’s in expensive hotel rooms and build tent cities all over the Metropolitan area you know there is a housing crisis. The illegal influx of migrants thanks to President Biden and Vice President Harris’s invitation to come to America accelerated an already existing housing shortage especially in urban areas
Support President Trump’s legislation to lower taxes. Believe it or not lower taxes generate more tax revenue when the people control the spending not the government.
Stop the “woke” nonsense, and being politically correct. Fight for restoring hiring and promoting people through merit not because of the color of their skin, gender or sexual orientation that was promoted through D.E.I. or Affirmative Action laws and executive orders. When a surgeon opens up your chest to do 5 way cardiac bypass surgeries, who do you want to help you live longer or even save your life. “Common Sense”
The Affirmative Action laws of the 1960’s were recently declared unconstitutional. Therefore you should lead the way and fight for restitution/reparations for Asians and Whites who were discriminated against that put them at the back of the line economically, emotionally and spiritually for 60 years reducing their chances of success, a stable and a decent wage, a better quality of life for them and their families that was instrumental for them to suffer through lost opportunities.
Stop supporting outlaw migrants and take that money and fix the dam streets motorists don’t have to waste time and money in auto repair stations from unnecessary road damage that the people’s tax dollars should have paid for long time ago. Paint the white lines on the highways to improve driving safety especially important in rain, fog and darkness. You might save some lives there. Take the homeless and mentally ill off the streets and help them. Bring back the mental institutions enough to cover all of our lost souls. They have value too.
Let the National Guard come into New York State everywhere, rid the state of the criminals and clean up the filth on our streets. Work with President Trump, encourage your Democrat colleagues to join Republicans like the Democrats of the past did. Become a common sense politician and perhaps a” DINO” .Democrat in name only
Final Note
Wikipedia: Affirmative action did not become law in a single act but was established through a series of executive orders starting in 1961 and 1965. President Kennedy’s 1961 Executive Order 10925 used the term “affirmative action” for the first time. Then, President Johnson’s 1965 Executive Order 11246 mandated federal contractors to take affirmative action to promote equal opportunity.
The backlash against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) stems from criticisms that such programs are discriminatory against majority groups, promote a specific political ideology rather than merit, or are poorly implemented and ineffective. Critics also argue that DEI programs ignore the principles of “colorblindness” and merit, or that they are unnecessary because social inequalities have already been addressed.